at 256, 865 N.W.2d 908. Dr. Hai testified that there was "absolutely no indication [from Dr. Beaghler] that we needed to pursue anything further." Although the opinion containing this information was not released until 2015, Dr. Hyde opined that Dr. Beaghler would have provided the same information if SIM had inquired. Dr. Sabit's operative report indicates that he performed a posterior lumbar interbody fusion, a laminectomy for decompression of the nerve, and an interbody cage placement, all at the L4-L5 level of plaintiff's spine. See Dorsey v. Surgical Institute of Mich. LLC , unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, entered May 6, 2020 (Docket No. (DeNinno, Andrew) (Entered: 06/08/2022), (#6) STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent The Allstate Corporation, Corporate Parent The Allstate Corporation for Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company. Dr. Hyde opined that it was a gross violation of the credentialing process to rely on Dr. Sabit to clarify the details of Dr. Beaghler's disclosures, especially after Dr. Sabit made material misrepresentations in his application. Phone Address 17000 Executive Plaza Drive, 101 Premiier Orthopedics, Dearborn, MI 48126-2793 Office Details Get Directions Insurance Accepted Medicare NOTE: Please contact the doctor's office to confirm your coverage before making an appointment. Internal Medicine. On November 14, 2018, plaintiff moved for entry of a judgment against SIM, Dr. Sabit, and MBSPG, jointly and severally. Additionally, Allstate's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply, [Dkt. Still University, School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona Class of 1997 Certifications & Licensure MI State License 1999 - 2024 Plaintiff continued to have persistent pain and was treating with one of Dr. Jagannathan's colleagues, a pain-management specialist. Chase is hereby ordered to provide responsive . Jiab Suleiman, Do, P.c. Npi 1598965543 Dr. Sabit told her that she needed surgery, specifically, a lumbar fusion and laminectomy. The ordeal had taken a toll on plaintiff's marriage, as she struggled with emotional turmoil and could not play much of a role with her family. SIM argued that a fair trial on the negligent-credentialing claim was impossible after the jury had been inundated with harsh criticisms of Dr. Sabit and implications that plaintiff had been left abandoned at SIM, unprotected and abused while she slept under anesthesia. After continued pain, an orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Jiab Suleiman, ordered a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) test of his shoulder and diagnosed him with a labral tear and a bruised . at 200, 670 N.W.2d 675 (citations omitted). During his investigation of this case, Dr. Hyde discovered why CMH suspended Dr. Sabit. 5 ], is DENIED AS MOOT. Id. SIM responded that it was a health facility, as set forth in MCL 333.20175(8), and entitled to the protections afforded by statute. Mueller v. Brannigan Bros. Indeed, SIM filed a pretrial motion for summary disposition with respect to plaintiff's negligent-credentialing claim. This Court found the defendant's position persuasive, agreeing that it was supported by the plain meaning of the statutory privilege. The jury found that Dr. Suleiman was not professionally negligent, and a no-cause judgment was entered in favor of Dr. Suleiman and his practicewhich is not at issue in this appeal.