Animals and humans share some similarities. The World Animal Foundation (WAF) is not a non-profit organization, and we neither accept nor solicit donations or charitable contributions. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity. Add to this fear and agony of a procedure, and only then can we start to understand the desperation and pain in which they live, every dayand for most, their entire lives. (New, About 6-12 million animals are killed for dissection annually in the US. Its not a question of right or wrong. Shes proud of her two Pushcart Nominations, her debut novel, and her marriage. CQ Roll Call is a part of FiscalNote, the leading technology innovator at the intersection of global business and government. Animal testing is cruel, unjust, and wasteful, and it needs to stop. Breathing in toxic fumes, implanting electrodes to the brain, repeatedly breeding, exposing to radiation and testing various drugs to infecting diseases are just a few items on the list that they have to face. The Animal Welfare Act should protect animals. It simply didnt work on humans.. However, the most commonly used animal used in dissection labs, frogs, are raised specifically to be killed and sent to schools for dissection. A recent study found that out of 93 dangerous drug side effects, only 19% could have been predicted by animal tests. However, many people believe that animal testing is justified because the animals are sacrificed to make products safer for human use and consumption. 26 Sept. In 20092010, 3,700 people received major organ transplants. Federal Register :: Hazardous Drugs: Procedures for Developing the The "Necessity" of Cosmetic Animal Testing - Britannica Animal testing is unethical, and completely immoral. The use of animals for scientific research is cruel and inhumane, while both humans and animals share similar traits, they are both made up of completely different genes making them poor test subjects to begin with and may mislead or cause side effects for both parties. Its challenging to review pictures of animals used without consent and not form an opinion.